Holden Commodore VT
Reviewed by Unique Cars and Parts
Our Rating: 1
Introduction
The VT represented a completely new model for the General, the second major model release since the 1978 VB and 1988 VN.
The basis for the car was the 1995 Opel Omega GM2800 platform, it being redesigned to suit, in turn making the Commodore both wider and longer, and more importantly significantly stronger.
The VT afforded more front and rear leg room, more shoulder room, and the boot capacity was increased by a whopping 26%.
The VT was the first Holden to include a driver's side airbag as standard equipment across all models, while IRS became a standard fitment to both sedans and wagons.
A new traction control system was on the options list, the first in an Australian built car, while a new braking system featured twin
piston calipers on the front to reduce pedal travel and brake fade.
In 1998, Side Impact Airbags were introduced, again a first for an Australian car.
Running changes introduced during VT production resulted in later builds being lighter and more fuel efficient than the earlier VT models.
Most notable of the improvements was the VT Series II, which saw the introduction of the Chevrolet Gen III LS1 5.7 litre V8, producing a stonking 220kW and 446Nm.
This engine replaced the aging Holden 5.0 litre V8. Changes were not confined to the engine bay, as a six-speed manual gearbox replaced the five-speed (on the V8).
The VT II Calais received a new instrument panel, and could be optioned to have a supercharged V6 engine. All models featured remote central locking.
It doesn't look like every other bland car on the road today.
i traded it in and got holden captiva lx diesel
best vehicle i have ever had nice and luxurious
excellent handling and your up higher
Now lets be serious here for at least one minute, Holden would never admit this, but the whole issue come down to poor management, cost cutting and its about executives lining their pockets with $$$. E/one else can go and please themselves.
Anyway, I digress, stay away from any Holden or Ford for that matter. I know people who work for these useless companies, and all they supply is cheap over rated rubbish. Last time I ever buy such a poor quality vehicle. They wont be seeing any more of my money.
Pay the extra and buy Japanese or european if you can afford it.
Rating...lame
VT series two 2000 model Commodore executive I'm very happy with it. IT IS A GREAT PERFORMENCE CAR.
AND I AGREE WITH FORD SUCKS The Ford Falcon Au is the biggest *** box of em all. and james you can go play with your *** *** falcon or even better cover it in fuel and burn it that's about all there good for and have any of you out there got any idea's where i could find a cheap steering rack and rails from in Queensland if you do it would be greatly appropriated thanks
the first car i owned was a VB Holden Commodore which was another OK build but i really hated the steering it was like parking a army tank when i hard to reverse park it.
but now that i have a
VT series two 2000 model Commodore executive I'm very happy with it.
apart from having to replace the
Radiator & Shokies that cost me $1000 for both then
i had to replace the Tyres which are 225/50 R16 Low Profile
which cost me $520 though a friend of mine.
but i also got
quotes from 2 other Tyer dealers.
dog tyres wanted $620 & Kmart wanted $820
and after i got my tyres fitted and balanced.
one of the guys found out that my steering rails arh stuffed
and that's gonna cost me another $500 to $600 i think to get it replaced.
then they have To balance my car tyres again so yeah it is a costly car to own but i still love the VT HOLDEN COMMODORE.
and as for you james the SHIT BOX OWNER of em all
why the hell Arh you on a Holden web site if you don't like Holden's
any way
the Ford Falcon Au *** 's big time as my friend owns one and he never shuts up about things stuffing up on it so yeah you don't know what your talking about any way FORD = FORGOTEN ON RACE DAY
about the only good ford i can think of is the
BOSS 350 or the FORD COBRA and there the only ford i like so yeah
and i whouldint be seen dead driveing any thing else unless i really had to.
any way I OWN A HOLDEN VT COMMODOORE 2000 model
and i had to reaplace my radiator and it had cracked and i also had to have my shokies replaced and it cost me up to $2000
plus i've had other work done on it and it whould of cost me up to $6500 but i am verey happey with it now and its a really good car to drive and it handels well.
and i dont think it's that bad on fuel.
now i own a VT ss 11 5.7 six speed , i refer too it as a boys car as i tend to let loose in it time too time it out performs the AU in many areas .. due to being a larger engine , and a manual performance is better as i think it is also aprox 200kg lighter , fuel econ in the Vt is much better by about 150km in the vt per tank , and it has a much smaller tank than the LTD , as for driving long distance i would take the AU over the VT any day as it is a less tiring car too drive , but as for putting your foot flat to the floor , and giving it all , the Vt *** s all over the AU , in all aspects , The two cars are built for totally diff types of driver . i hope this puts some light onto the subject . cheers and safe driving
please see my comments on PG1 re: the VS seies 2 compared to the rest. Then you will probably deduce why Holden didn't release a Getrag manual version of the Supercharged 3.8 V6? I guess because it would of enabled aftermarket mods to happen and a 6 cylinder ( XU2 - wish), would have put Ford's & their heavy V8's to shame in straight line performance & handling. To go fast "Keep it light and keep it quick!!
high trye wear is a proplem though